A high-profile APA journal is investigating a widely-cited paper on generative AI's cognitive effects after independent researchers flagged 'mathematically impossible' results, missing ethics approval, and flawed data analysis. This is a significant story: the study was heavily cited in discussions about AI's impact on human cognition and work, making its potential retraction a meaningful moment for research integrity in the AI era. Strong fit for p2preview — combines AI, peer review failure, and research integrity in one case.

Source: Retraction Watch