via Retraction Watch
tagged with via Retraction Watch
'Weekend reads: LLMs ''are not the problem''; Cash for peer review ''doesn''t
Retraction Watch's latest weekly roundup features coverage arguing
'Weekend reads: How to buy a scientific paper; creating responsible authorship
'Retraction Watch''s roundup covers: calls to sanction researchers
'Guest post: Forget pickles and ice cream. I published a fake paper on pregnancy
A mathematician deliberately submitted a wholly ChatGPT-generated
Weekend reads: LLMs 'are not the problem'; Cash for peer review 'doesn't work,' project finds
The headline 'LLMs are not the problem' represents a notable shift in discourse — a reframing of research integrity concerns away from LLMs as sole culprit.
Why Don't Journalists Circle Back to Cover Retractions?
This piece sits at the intersection of research integrity and AI risk: if journalists don't correct coverage of retracted papers, AI systems trained on or summarizing that coverage will propagate false findings even further.
University of Melbourne opens formal investigation into education researcher John Hattie
Highlighted article via Retraction Watch. Integrity.
Forget pickles and ice cream. I published a fake paper on pregnancy cravings for prime numbers
Highlighted article via Retraction Watch. Integrity.
Weekend reads: How to buy a scientific paper; creating responsible authorship culture; sanction authors for hallucinated references?
Highlighted article via Retraction Watch. Integrity.
Page 1 of 1