The Peer-to-Processor Review

A first-person perspective from a senior scientist on the cognitive costs of AI dependency in research.

STM's Trends 2030 report places AI-driven discovery at the center of scholarly publishing's near-term future.

A Scholarly Kitchen essay argues that AI is not merely a workflow efficiency tool for academic publishing — it is a structural transformation of how knowledge circulates and how scientific authority is conferred.

Peer Review Week 2026's theme — 'Peer Review Capacity: Volume, Speed and Quality' — reflects mounting concern about whether the traditional peer review system can handle the explosion of submissions in the AI era.

There is growing skepticism toward the role of publishers, a steady commoditization of publishing services, and fragmentation across the research ecosystem driven in part by AI.

A recap of a roundtable conversation with library and information science experts touching on AI, research integrity, open access, and the evolving role of academic libraries in a transformed scholarly publishing landscape.

Wendy Queen interviews Nadim Sadek, founder of Shimmr AI, who argues AI can strengthen human creativity rather than replace it, with discussion of AI in publishing workflows, multimodal publishing, and the concept of 'emancipation AI' vs 'efficiency AI.'

Todd Toler and Angela Cochran argue that the biggest challenges in

Nadim Sadek, founder of Shimmr AI, argues that AI can strengthen

Robert Harington surveys the pressures facing scholarly society publishers

Authors of a 2018 debate on AI in peer review revisit their original

Candid intelligence on what scholarly publishing leaders actually