The Peer-to-Processor Review

MDPI has deployed its in-house AI integrity system, "Ethicality," at full scale across all manuscript submissions — processing approximately 2,000 submissions per day globally.

A Knowledgespeak editorial argues that scholarly content is migrating beyond traditional access models — reading, reference, citation, course adoption — into AI-powered practice environments where content is embedded directly into professional workflows.

Academic librarians view AI as legitimate — a tool they recognize and accept — but not loved or enthusiastically embraced.

Springer Nature will begin issuing expressions of concern for books — a first for the publisher — following an uptick in integrity investigations across its book catalog.

BISG and BookNet Canada have launched their second annual survey on AI in the book industry, capturing experiences, concerns, priorities, and expectations among publishing professionals in North America.

Scholarly Kitchen examines what happens to scholarly content platforms when AI agents — rather than human researchers — become the primary users.

RFK Jr.

This Retraction Watch Weekend Reads roundup is flagged primarily because of the 'journal editor resigns for AI concerns' item embedded within it.

APS has revised its AI policy to expand permissible AI use in manuscript preparation and peer review, while maintaining a hard line on human oversight and accountability.

Wiley and IQVIA co-authored a senior-leader intelligence report on AI's role across the science-to-patient pipeline, drawing on 25+ leaders from pharma, academic medicine, health systems, and publishing.

STM has issued a strong statement opposing OMB's proposed federal funding guidance revisions, which would affect how federally funded research is published and disseminated.

MDPI has fully deployed its proprietary AI ethics screening system, 'Ethicality,' across all manuscript submissions — a significant operational milestone.