The Peer-to-Processor Review

Liverpool University Press becomes the first third-party publisher to adopt Wiley's Research Exchange platform, with AI-enabled integrity screening explicitly cited as a primary driver.

AAAS and DataSeer are extending their ongoing partnership with a new pilot focused on improving research quality and reproducibility while reducing author effort, using AI-supported workflows across the Science family of journals.

AAAS (publisher of Science) and DataSeer are piloting full AI automation of MDAR reporting checklists at manuscript submission.

A roundup covering LLMs and research integrity, the failure of cash incentives for peer review, and a deep dive into the vaping literature's reproducibility problems.

A Retraction Watch roundup anchored by emerging debate on whether LLMs are intrinsically problematic for scholarly integrity or merely a symptom of deeper system failures.

Excellent editorial perspective — the 'arrived through use, not design' framing is sharp and under-covered.

Highly relevant and timely.

Frontiers has introduced a first-of-its-kind AI guidance framework spanning the entire publication lifecycle, offering practical routes for responsible AI adoption by researchers, editors, and peer reviewers.

Relevant to the research integrity beat.

A recap of a roundtable conversation with library and information science experts touching on AI, research integrity, open access, and the evolving role of academic libraries in a transformed scholarly publishing landscape.

Wendy Queen interviews Nadim Sadek, founder of Shimmr AI, who argues AI can strengthen human creativity rather than replace it, with discussion of AI in publishing workflows, multimodal publishing, and the concept of 'emancipation AI' vs 'efficiency AI.'

The mention of AI-generated fake article networks elevates this beyond a standard retraction roundup.