The OMB Guidance Revision Threatens All Research

Scholarly Kitchen analysis argues OMB guidance revision threatens not just STEM but all research including

Springer Nature Takes Back Retraction of Max Planck's Papers

Springer Nature has reversed the retraction of papers by Max Planck Institute researchers,

MIT Press introduces NeuroNexus, journal on intelligence research

MIT Press launches NeuroNexus, an interdisciplinary journal at the intersection of psychology, neuroscience,

Global Cooperation Needed to Tackle 'Disease' of Fake Degrees

International higher education leaders are calling for coordinated global action against

Clarivate publishes 2026 G20 research and innovation scorecard

Clarivate's Institute for Scientific Information released the 2026 G20 Research and Innovation

Choice and Wiley release report on transformative agreements in academic libraries

Choice and Wiley release a report on transformative agreements in US academic libraries, examining how libraries

'‘The exploitation still remains’: Stats journal associate editors resign over $3,000 publishing charge'

Eighteen associate editors of Statistics and Computing resign after Springer Nature announces a $3,000 APC

Why Research Libraries Oppose the OMB Revisions to the Uniform Guidance

ARL explains why research libraries oppose the OMB Uniform Guidance revisions—restrictions that would limit

SPIE acquires The Lens to expand access to patent data

SPIE acquires The Lens, the open-knowledge platform providing global access to scholarly works and patent

Where Do We Go From Here? How Scientific Societies are Thinking about the Proposed OMB Funding Rule

Scholarly Kitchen guest post presents society publishing leaders' perspectives on the OMB proposed funding

'Exclusive: Sage to retract multiple articles by dismissed rising star for “compromised” peer-review process'

Sage moves to retract multiple articles by a dismissed Radboud University management researcher for 'compromised'

Springer Nature un-retracts Planck papers, citing 'human error'

Springer Nature reverses a 2011 retraction of Max Planck papers, citing 'human error.' Raises questions about