The Peer-to-Processor Review

A Scholarly Kitchen guest post proposing methodology to identify and measure robotic (AI crawler/agent) usage of scholarly content.

A Scholarly Kitchen post directly interrogating the 'zero-click' readership problem: as AI overviews (Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, etc.) synthesize research inline, users no longer click through to primary sources.

'A scientist trained before AI sounds an alarm about the wholesale outsourcing of thinking to AI tools in research, arguing that no amount of computational efficiency can compensate for the erosion of human reasoning capacity in science.'

A direct response to the AI content flood: the authors argue publishers must reassert their gatekeeping role rather than outsourcing it to post-publication tools.