The Peer-to-Processor Review

Research integrity demands stronger safeguards, but for editors, new integrity measures do not replace existing tasks — they are added alongside them, compounding workloads and responsibilities.

A Scholarly Kitchen guest post examines why the systems supporting research — publishing, peer review, funding infrastructure — have failed to keep pace with the expectations placed on them.

A Scholarly Kitchen guest post frames the evolution of OA publishing through an ecological metaphor — arguing that diamond open access represents a path from parasitism (extractive APC models) to symbiosis (community-owned publishing).

The Scholarly Kitchen interviews Annual Reviews CEO Richard Gallagher about the acquisition of Underline Science, an academic video and event platform.

A Scholarly Kitchen piece reframes 'Open Science 2.0' around the challenges of AI mediation: open access is necessary but insufficient if AI systems distort, summarize, or misrepresent research.

Scholarly Kitchen argues Open Science 2.0 must focus not only on access but on trust, interpretation, and

Scholarly Kitchen presents outcomes from the WCRI Focus Track on AI disclosure standardization in research.

Scholarly Kitchen analysis argues OMB guidance revision threatens not just STEM but all research including

ARL explains why research libraries oppose the OMB Uniform Guidance revisions—restrictions that would limit

Scholarly Kitchen guest post presents society publishing leaders' perspectives on the OMB proposed funding

SSP Pulse Check survey provides a community-wide snapshot of social media usage in scholarly publishing.

A call to action for the scholarly publishing community to formally recognize AI's growing role in peer review and develop clear, consistent policy frameworks.